Like this story?

Tall, Dark and Autistic Sperm?

Does a sperm donor in California prove that autism can be genetic?

sperm_giving_autism.jpg

In the April issue of O magazine is the story of a sperm donor who "fathered" 11 autistic children with eight different Moms. The Moms found each other on the Donor Sibling Registry--a Web site service that has matched more than 4,000 children with half-siblings--and they were startled to discover similar social and communication impairments that characterize kids with autism.

None of the Moms have a family history, and, according to the California Cryobank, nothing showed up on Donor X's medical profile either. A similar case at the California Cryobank showed four of the seven children from Donor 3066 were diagnosed with autism.

"It's true if you that if you marry someone and have a child, you never know the whole picture about genetic risk,"  Liza Mundy, author of Everything Conceivable: How Assisted Reproduction Is Changing Men, Women, and the World, told Oprah Magazine. "But because sperm donation has become an industry, a greater number of people will be at risk from a single person's genetic makeup."

The stories raise huge questions about autism and genetics. Would a family history of autism make you fearful to have children?


4 comments so far

Add a Text Comment
SugarPlumFairy ? on March 17, 2008 4:54 PM wrote:

this scenario is truly scary.

 
DImom on March 18, 2008 9:01 AM wrote:

Yes, VERY scary! There are many health issues that donors may not know about when they donate. Since many are in college, they don’t find out about some health issues until later in life and then it’s difficult for them to communicate them to the offspring. DonorOffspringHealth.com is one site that is trying to connect offspring with each other to share health information and provide a place where donors can post health information anonymously.

 
Ginger Taylor on March 18, 2008 11:15 AM wrote:

“The stories raise huge questions about autism and genetics.”

No it doesn’t.

There are many contraversial things in the autism debate, but this is not one of them. Everyone from the CDC to the mom’s who believe that vaccines triggered their children’s autism (of which I am one) believes that autism has a genetic basis. The adage being that genes load the gun, environment pulls the trigger.

Autism DOES run in families, this is a settled question.

What is not settled, and does raise huge questions, is that since there is no such thing as a genetic epidemic (those genes have always been in these families) why so much autism now?

The answer has to be in the environmental triggers.

Too many toxins. Much more than this genetically vulnerable subset of the population can handle.

We can’t control the genes people are born with, but we can control their toxic exposure. And we can start by taking a hard look at at all the toxins in vaccines, and decide if kids REALLY need 36 vaccines by the time they are 18 months old.

When I was a child in the 70’s, we only got 10 vaccines. And there were no viral epidemics and no autism epidemics.

 
cindy on April 3, 2008 8:40 AM wrote:

I have a child with autism that was blue at birth and I had bleeding during pregnancy,I believe he was oxygen deprived, so autism isn’t always caused by one thing.

 

(not displayed)
  remember me?      
 

Avoid clicking “Post” more than once.

HAPPY HALLOWEEN!
BREAST CANCER AWARENESS
COUPONS & SALES