twitter facebook stumble upon rss

Priest Asks Parishoners to Repent for Obama Vote

sign up for the momlogic newsletter Tweet This

Associated Press: A South Carolina Roman Catholic priest has told his parishioners that they should refrain from receiving Holy Communion if they voted for Barack Obama because the Democratic president-elect supports abortion, and supporting him "constitutes material cooperation with intrinsic evil."

The Rev. Jay Scott Newman said in a letter distributed Sunday to parishioners at St. Mary's Catholic Church in Greenville that they are putting their souls at risk if they take Holy Communion before doing penance for their vote.

"Our nation has chosen for its chief executive the most radical pro-abortion politician ever to serve in the United States Senate or to run for president," Newman wrote, referring to Obama by his full name, including his middle name of Hussein.

"Voting for a pro-abortion politician when a plausible pro-life alternative exists constitutes material cooperation with intrinsic evil, and those Catholics who do so place themselves outside of the full communion of Christ's Church and under the judgment of divine law. Persons in this condition should not receive Holy Communion until and unless they are reconciled to God in the Sacrament of Penance, lest they eat and drink their own condemnation."

During the 2008 presidential campaign, many bishops spoke out on abortion more boldly than four years earlier, telling Catholic politicians and voters that the issue should be the most important consideration in setting policy and deciding which candidate to back. A few church leaders said parishioners risked their immortal soul by voting for candidates who support abortion rights.

But bishops differ on whether Catholic lawmakers -- and voters -- should refrain from receiving Communion if they diverge from church teaching on abortion. Each bishop sets policy in his own diocese. In their annual fall meeting, the nation's Catholic bishops vowed Tuesday to forcefully confront the Obama administration over its support for abortion rights.

According to national exit polls, 54 percent of Catholics chose Obama, who is Protestant. In South Carolina, which McCain carried, voters in Greenville County -- traditionally seen as among the state's most conservative areas -- went 61 percent for the Republican, and 37 percent for Obama.

"It was not an attempt to make a partisan point," Newman said in a telephone interview Thursday. "In fact, in this election, for the sake of argument, if the Republican candidate had been pro-abortion, and the Democratic candidate had been pro-life, everything that I wrote would have been exactly the same."

Conservative Catholics criticized Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry in 2004 for supporting abortion rights, with a few Catholic bishops saying Kerry should refrain from receiving Holy Communion because his views were contrary to church teachings.

Sister Mary Ann Walsh, spokeswoman for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, said she had not heard of other churches taking this position in reaction to Obama's win. A Boston-based group that supports Catholic Democrats questioned the move, saying it was too extreme.

"Father Newman is off base," said Steve Krueger, national director of Catholic Democrats. "He is acting beyond the authority of a parish priest to say what he did. ... Unfortunately, he is doing so in a manner that will be of great cost to those parishioners who did vote for Sens. Obama and Biden. There will be a spiritual cost to them for his words."

A man who has attended St. Mary's for 18 years said he welcomed Newman's message and anticipated it would inspire further discussion at the church.

"I don't understand anyone who would call themselves a Christian, let alone a Catholic, and could vote for someone who's a pro-abortion candidate," said Ted Kelly, 64, who volunteers his time as lector for the church. "You're talking about the murder of innocent beings."

Read more hot stories Moms Are Talking About.

next: Are Puppy Parties Cruel?
3 comments so far | Post a comment now
Anna November 18, 2008, 1:12 PM

people are going to be really irritated that I say this, but I agree with the priest. If someone who was outwardly anti-christian (not a good campaign stratadgy but…) I think they have more church leaders doing the same. Someone who is willing to kill the innocent, while still claiming to be under the will of God is outwardly doing a sacriligious act and by voting for them you are supporting their beliefs.

angela December 1, 2008, 12:29 PM

I know that people are going to get really really irritated when I say this but, I think the priest is taking his robe and his ‘belief in God’ and hiding it under a racial overtone. The reason why I have taken this position is that I haven’t heard from this particular priest or its parishioners when it comes to other candidates with similar pro-choice issues. Take former mayor Rudy Guillani who was not only republican but pro-choice as well. Was there moral outrage then? What about all the other democratic or republican candidates that have the same position prior to Obama.

PaxTemallesse April 1, 2011, 12:51 AM

Women, girls, teenagers and younger, Darrel Jenkins in his insatiable
lust had never been able to get enough, but both this enticing creature
and her mother had peaked his sadistic and lecherous passion too long
not to be savored to the fullest. He’d planned their seduction for
three years, when this magnificent golden creature before him had been
no more than twelve and he’d first laid eyes on both her and her mother
at a bank staff family picnic, then carefully cultivated and groomed
their avaricious father-husband into his compromised position … until
now, the palatable culmination of all his efforts was about to be
fruitfully reveled in.

Back to top >>