Posh is giving her hubby a run for his money in her very own Armani ads. Wait until you see these pics!
Posh allegedly made $17.5 million for starring in the latest Armani underwear campaign. Armani wanted Posh for the ads because: "Victoria is a style icon, a dynamic lady whose influence and recognition will add great excitement to the continued international growth of our underwear business." We're thinking: though the pics are provocative and super sexy, Mrs. Becks looks quite enhanced (by Photoshop that is.) Reps for Armani had "no comment" when momlogic asked how much the pics were Photoshopped. Who is sexier: the Mr. or the Mrs.?
 | |
 |  |
| Celeb Photoshop | Shirtless David Beckham |
filed under: fashion logic
Email3 comments so far | Post a comment now >>
You are entirely incorrect that she made $17.5 million dollars for this ad. ARE YOU CRAZY??? Get your facts straight.
- Dyanara
Actually this is accurate—she made 17.5 million dollar for a campaign they can use for 3 years. SO THERE> YOU get your facts straight.
- jackie
HOLD ON A SECOND … how is it OK for Armani to put Posh Spice in her FRIGGIN UNDERWEAR in WAY MORE PROVOCATIVE poses, but Urban Outfitters is wrong for having models either naked, topless or wearing sheer tops? Is it because she’s a celebrity? She’s got a hunky husband? Armani & Armani Exchange are sold in WAY more malls then Urban Outfitters, and surely, these ads will appear in dozens of magazines that IMPRESSIONABLE teenagers will read. Millions and MILLIONS of people will see these ads then read the Urban Outfitters catalog. Double standards, momlogic. yeah, actually that sounds like Mom Logic to me, i.e. silly celebrity worship. totally inconsistent.
- sad songs are natures onions
|  |
|||||||||||||||
|
advertisement
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
 |
||||||||||||||||
 WIN IT! This new game has some serious bite!
Enter Here |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
 |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
 |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
advertisement
|
