Texas Wants to Ban the Teen Tan

The bill would require anyone under 18 years old to get a doctor's note before using a tanning bed.

A proposal that would make it harder for Texas teenagers to enter the tanning bed was compared to legislation against Big Tobacco as lawmakers took up the issue.
"In the United states and Texas, we don't allow our teens to purchase cigarettes until after they are 18 because it is a carcinogen," said Rep. Burt Solomons. "Yet we don't do that for tanning beds, which can expose teens to the same risk for cancer."
The bill would require anyone under 18 years old to get a doctor's note before using a tanning bed and would require a parent be with them in the salon. Supporters and detractors said this would be the strictest legislation any state has passed on teen tanning.
Current Texas law requires parent permission slips for children up to 18 and that adults go with their children if they are under 16. Children under 13 can also tan if they get permission from a doctor.
In testimony to the board Tuesday, one of the state's largest tanning salons said current oversight is strong enough, and that parents should decide whether their child can use a tanning bed.
"This should not be a state issue, a doctor's issue -- it's a parental issue. I have a right to decide what is right or wrong for my daughter," said Diane Lucas, president of Texas-based Palm Beach Tan. She was also representing the Indoor Tanning Association.
Lucas said there are 75 Palm Beach Tans in Texas employing more than 500 Texans. Though she said the average age of their clients is 32, the loss of business from restricting teen access would hurt small businesses in a tough economy.
Dermatologists and melanoma survivors argued that tanning beds are a proven risk for skin cancer including melanoma, and teens are at particularly high risk for such damage.
"Epidemiological studies have now shown that even one exposure to tanning beds before the age of 35 can increase your risk for melanoma," said Sharon Raimer, a dermatologist and president of the Texas Dermatological Society. Raimer said she favors the bill.
UV light treatments similar to tanning beds are used to treat some skin conditions, but Raimer said she would prefer those be treated in a controlled, medical environment.
Both sides acknowledged that a doctor's note would be difficult to get if the bill passed. The bill was left pending in the House Public Health Committee.
Parents should keep their kids out of tanning salons, according to pediatrician Dr. Cara Natterson.
"The sun produces two kinds of light: visible and ultraviolet (UV)," explains pediatrician Dr. Cara Natterson. "It is the UV light that makes us tan or burn. When tanning beds were first coming into popularity, some people said that they were safer than the sun. These folks argued that if you tanned yourself on a tanning bed before going into the sun, you would be less likely to burn. Because sun cancers are highly correlated with burns, especially blistering burns, tanning beds were supposed to 'protect' you."
"But as it turns out," Dr. Cara continues, "tanning beds are probably no safer than the sun. Three studies were published last year concluding that 'there is no such thing as a safe tan.' Tanning beds use UV light and this is known to cause skin cancer."
Dr. Cara's bottom line: "Now, more than ever, people need to understand the risks of UV exposure," she says. "When you go out in the sun, you should be using sunscreen. And in
my opinion, parents should keep their kids out of tanning salons."
What do you think of this proposed teen tan ban?
Opps, that last post, As a Texan I’m a little put off, was not meant to be anonymous. I’ll own my opinions thank you very much.
I can’t believe you need a parents signature to go to a tanning bed but don’t need a parent’s consent to chop up or burn a helpless infant in it’s Mothers womb…What a crazy world of mixed up values. A life not being important enough to protect but hey, it’s ok to look beautiful with a tanned body.
Nice Chris, turn this into an abortion debate!! Anyhow, so when I was in high school, there was this story going around that this one girl was trying to get super tan for prom and went to like 7 different tanning places in one day and then went home and died because her blood boiled!!! I don’t know if that could actually happen, I just always like to share that story!! I don’t know, I haven’t been tanning since my dad had a malignant melanoma removed from his back. Of course, we live in Oklahoma where it is very HOT in the summers so we do swim alot. I don’t get burned anymore though because I have 2 young kids who are usually ready to quit before I get too much sun. I have already decided that this summer I will be wearing sunscreen on my face and shoulders because I am only 27 and already have sunspots. Plus, I have seen my grandma have several spots removed from her arms and face (she went to the beach all her life) It’s just not worth it!! Which reminds me, I need to go buy sunscreen!!!!
What does abortion have to do with tanning? And why is a man on Momlogic.com.
Very strange.
Well, I think that banning tanning salons is a good idea.
Smoking gives people cancer, and tanning does make people more likely to get melanoma. If smoking should be banned, then so should tanning.
this is just stupid. The sun itself causes cancer too, should kids be forced to stay indoors at all times until they turn 18? What DOESN’T cause cancer these days?!?! Everything in moderation! Politicians are wasting their time on crap like this bill? I can’t believe they get paid to do this #$&*!
I wish this law would have been passed when I was a teenager. I used to go tanning with my mom as a kind of “Mother-daughter” time starting at 16. I had a few blistering tans before I turned 18. Last month I found a mole that had started changing on my back and had it removed. It was not cancer, but was atypical and would most likely have turned into melanoma. I’m only 27. When I was a teenager I remember thinking “When I get skin cancer, I’ll be too old to care.” I thought it was an old person disease. I couldn’t have been more wrong. I’m sure there are alot of teens out there with the same outlook. They have no idea that they may experience melanoma in their 20’s. Someone needs to do something. This is so preventable. The perception that tan is beautiful or healthy needs to change.
Did anyone catch this? A dr’s note? Give me a break! If your going to ban it, ban it! Don’t sneak around with underhanded tatics. “Drs note” implies the indication that something is needed for a medical condition, last I checked, “Tanning” wasn’t a medical treatment.
Also, I think this is a good idea, there are plenty of products out now that allow you to get a sun kissed look at home. I don’t think this is really a “parents right” issue … .its about limiting a product to a certain age range of people. Period. Odd how parents aren’t bitching about Ciggs being “19 or over.”
This is insane. Did anyone else catch the “no safer than the sun” part? Next it will be mandatory sunscreen and long sleeved shirts!
I don’t think any child should be allowed to use a tanning salon. A doctor’s approval is not going to stop the abuse. The mothers who allow this type of “primping” will search around till they find a doctor who will give their daughters permission. It’s a completely mute point and a waste of our tax dollars having legislators spending time on it.
I THINK THIS SHOULD PASS OR TANNING SALON NEED TO GIVE A PART OF ITS MONEY FOR CANCER CARE TO HELP FIND A TREATMENT FOR SKIN CANCER , IF IT DONT PASS TEENS SHOULDN’T BE ALLOWED TO TAN BUT 3 TIMES IN 6 DAYS







As a Texan I’m a little put off by this. While I whole heartedly agree that kids shouldn’t be in tanning beds, I also don’t agree that the choice should be taken away from the parents. I think the salons should be held to higher standards and that they need to be watched more carefully for rules compliance. And I think the rules could be changed where a parent needs to be present, no ifs, ands, or buts. However, I don’t think a doctor is required in this. I mean, a kid can walk outside and potentially do more damage. At least this way they are only exposed, hopefully under parental supervision, for a limited amount of time. Step outside your front door in Texas any time during the summer and your hit with UV rays that will knock your socks off. I remember getting completely fried laying out for a nice tan as a kid. Is this a better option? Because that’s what’s going to happen. At least if a parent is involved it might slow down the process of some teens getting overexposed. Also, they could look into limiting the number of visits anyone under 18 can have in a month to 4-5 and no more than 2 visits any given week. Force the parent to spread it out some. I know that the option is to go to another salon but it still might slow down the usage.