twitter facebook stumble upon rss

Are Babies Bad for the Environment?

sign up for the momlogic newsletter Tweet This
UPI: British researchers have concluded that contraception is a much cheaper way to reduce carbon emissions than conventional green technologies.

one lonely baby

A report prepared by the London School of Economics says for every $6.63 spent on contraceptives over the next 40 years it would cost $31.48 to achieve the same reduction in CO2 emissions with low carbon technology, the Daily Telegraph reported Wednesday.

"It's always been obvious that total emissions depend on the number of emitters as well as their individual emissions," says Roger Martin, chairman of the Optimum Population Trust at the London School of Economics.

Martin says carbon tonnage can't decrease while the population is increasing.

United Nations data indicates that family planning could reduce unintended births by 72 percent, trimming the world's population by half a billion to 8.64 million in 2050.

Read more hot stories Moms Are Talking About.

next: Vacationing Girl's Message in Bottle Follows Her Home
2 comments so far | Post a comment now
Tina Feduniewicz December 2, 2010, 8:01 PM

Recently i stumbled on your blog and have been reading along. I figured I will leave my first comment since it truly captured my focus. I will drop back again often to look for new material.

Myra Bielecki December 13, 2010, 10:56 PM

Keep the blog posts coming. I enjoy checking out your things. : ).

Back to top >>