twitter facebook stumble upon rss

2-Year-Old Denied Health Insurance for Being Underweight

sign up for the momlogic newsletter Tweet This

ABC 7 News: ERIE, Colo. -- First it was a 4-month-old Grand Junction boy who was denied health insurance coverage because, at 17 pounds, he was considered overweight. Now comes word that a 2-year-old Erie girl has also been denied coverage because she doesn't weigh enough.

Aislin Bates

Aislin Bates weighed 6 pounds, 6 ounces at birth. She now tips the scale at 22 pounds.

"She's perfectly healthy, yet she has become a statistic," said Aislin's mother, Rachel Bates. "There's no reason for her to be a statistic as a non-insured person."

When Aislin's father, Rob, worked for another company, Aislin was covered under the company's group health insurance plan.

Now that Rob is working on his own, he's had to get new insurance. The company, UnitedHealthcare's Golden Rule, sent the family a letter, which says in part, "We are unable to provide coverage for Aislin because her height and weight do not meet our company standards."

"It took me by surprise," said Rob Bates. "I didn't think that her size was that abnormal and that it was something that you'd consider to be unhealthy."

"I had no idea that this would be an issue," Rachel Bates added, "because we always had group insurance with his job. I was floored when a height-weight standard prevented coverage."

A spokeswoman for UnitedHealthcare's Golden Rule said 89 percent of the people who apply for insurance get it. Ellen Laden, the company's public relations director, told 7NEWS that most insurers have their own proprietary height and weight guidelines.

"Ours are based on several medical sources, including the Centers for Disease Control, and are well within industry standards," she said.

Laden, who said she couldn't talk specifically about the Bates' case, added that, "When evaluating height and weight, we typically utilize other factors as well in making a decision, such as medical records that show evidence of treatment or any underlying medical conditions."

The Bates say Aislin is undergoing treatment for an active gag reflex.

"It's very minor and she probably will only need therapy for a few more months," Rachel said.

Rachel told 7NEWS that both the therapist and her pediatrician wrote letters in support of the family's quest to appeal the insurance company's decision. Both stated that Aislin is healthy and continues to grow.

"We would definitely like to see insurance reform," Rob Bates said. "We are not proponents of universal health care by any means, but what we want to see is that insurance companies have legitimate reasons for denying coverage."

State Senator Betty Boyd, D-Lakewood, chairs the state's Health Care Task Force. She said, "If I were making the decisions, I think I would certainly cover this child."

Boyd said it behooves insurers to be reasonable when making their decisions.

"If insurers exercise reason, they're less likely to see mandates coming down the pike."

Laden said, "If a child did not meet our weight guidelines and the child was treated and continued to show steady growth for several months after treatment ended, in most cases we would reconsider covering the child."

Laden added that comprehensive coverage is currently available through Cover Colorado for individuals who don't qualify for health insurance in the individual market. The Bates said Aislin is temporarily covered through COBRA, a federal program that allows people to continue an employer-based health insurance plan for up to 18 months. The parents said it costs as much to cover Aislin under COBRA as it costs to cover the remaining three family members.

"You'd never think that something like size, something that seems so irrelevant to your health, would be a discriminating factor," Rachel said.

In the Grand Junction case, Rocky Mountain Health Plans changed its policy and now says it won't consider obesity a "pre-existing" condition barring coverage for hefty infants. The Bates are hoping United HealthCare's Golden Rule has a similar change of heart.

Read more stories moms are talking about.



next: Would You Buy Your Daughter a Vibrator?
5 comments so far | Post a comment now
Terry October 20, 2009, 9:43 PM

Absolutely ridiculous. Just the other day the insurance lobby was arguing that if we implement a national health plan that that we would abuse it by not signing up for insurance until we are very, very ill OR that we would sign up for the cheaper national plan and cause them to raise rates all around. Now, now, now…. can you have your cake and eat it too? Obama’s plan seems a little more reasonable now that some of the truth is being exposed. Kudos.

claire October 20, 2009, 10:59 PM

What’s up with that? Underweight overweight. Doesn’t the insurance company realize there is nothing they can do except to change their attitude towards people’s plight. We can do something about this, because we are the ones suffering, not them. Our solution is to VOTE with the Presiding PRESIDENT.

xbones08 October 21, 2009, 1:54 AM

I say we activate the insurance of the ppl that run health ins…or their life insurance…

Lady R October 21, 2009, 5:20 PM

It is ridiculous…

According to a Blue Cross sales rep - Blue Cross, Blue Shield has a weight to height restriction - which according to the representative, has caused a lot of problems in states where there are high Native American populations, and even though the Insurance Representatives have tried to get them to change that policy and make exceptions - the company refuses! - Its a problem for people in states like Alaska - of which I am from and a lot of the population are Native Alaskan, and are not part of the European National
Average of caucasian acceptable weight - Its shameful - how do they then explain the Samoan populations? who are - naturally big boned, and definitely mess up that - “average statistic!” - and so - He suggested Assurant - while may have a higher premium will take new customers who are not the national average in weight to height ratio - ….

SOMETHING NEEDS to be Done! - I agree! -

Julie October 22, 2009, 5:45 AM

I will play devil’s advocate here and remind everyone that UHC is a private health insurance co and just like car insurance, you can be denied. No one would be balking at a car insurance co for denying someone w/ 20 accidents in a year…just something to think about. And yes, I do think obesity (or the reverse) is a pre-existing condition.


Leave a reply:



(not displayed)

     




Avoid clicking "Post" more than once
Back to top >>
advertisement