twitter facebook stumble upon rss

Explicit 'Banned Book' Infuriates Virginia Father, Leads to School Review

sign up for the momlogic newsletter Tweet This
Fox News: A Virginia man says he became "infuriated" when he discovered that his 16-year-old son brought home a book he'd been given in school that contained references to homosexuality, drug use and explicit sexual behavior.

perksofbeingawallflower270.jpg
The father's complaint has led to a school review of the novel, "Perks of Being a Wallflower" by Stephen Chbosky, which has been a source of controversy in other schools across the country.

John Davis, of Vinton, Va., said his son, Matthew, brought the book home after it was given to him by a friend who had gotten it from Kathleen Renard, an English teacher at William Byrd High School.

"My first reaction when I saw the contents of the book was anger," Davis told FOXNews.com. "I was infuriated. Teachers are supposed to be teaching our kids what they need to know educationally. These kinds of things are the parent's responsibility."

"Perks of Being a Wallflower" chronicles a young man's freshman year of high school, during which he struggles to find his place in an ever-changing setting. According to the American Library Association, the 224-page novel, published in 1999 by MTV Books, was among the top 10 frequently challenged books of 2008 due to its references to drugs, homosexuality, offensive language, suicide and other material considered unsuitable to certain age groups.

Davis said the book's "very descriptive" language on topics like homosexuality, masturbation and drug use is inappropriate for his son, who is in 11th grade.

"I don't think it's age-appropriate for anyone," he said. "I don't think adults should be reading that junk. It's pornography. They're corrupting his mind with this garbage."

Davis said he confiscated the book and contacted William Byrd High School principal Richard Turner to arrange a meeting with him and Renard. During the Oct. 2 meeting, Davis said, Turner refused to make Renard available and emphatically stated he would not fire her.

"I just wanted her to be in the meeting to know why she supplied the book," Davis said. "[Turner] even admitted that it was trash and that it shouldn't be in school."

Messages seeking comment from Turner and Renard were not returned. A call to MTV Books seeking comment on Wednesday was not immediately returned.

Chuck Lionberger, community relations specialist for Roanoke County Public Schools, said the principal removed two copies of the book from the school's library following Davis' complaint.

"The book is being reviewed under the school system's established policy relating to challenged material," Lionberger said in a statement to FOXNews.com. "The book had been placed in the school library using established procedures relating to library material. The principal also took appropriate personnel action."

He said school district policy prevented him from specifying what action was taken against Renard.

Davis said he wants other parents to know "that these kinds of things are going on" in public schools nationwide, although he didn't cite any evidence to that effect. The book was removed from classrooms last year in Portage, Ind., according to the American Library Association.

"The main reason for my complaint is to get the information out," Davis said. "I hope to wake some people up so they can say, 'I don't want my kids to be a part of something like this.' At this point in his maturity level, I don't think he was in a place to be subjected to that book or to handle it properly."

Carrie Gardner, assistant professor of library science at Kutztown University in Pennsylvania, defended the coming-of-age novel, saying it may be helpful in providing "coping strategies" to teenagers.

"Our young people are living in a world full of both fiction and nonfiction situations that deal with drug use and sexuality," Gardner told FOXNews.com. "Fiction books that contain that type of information can provide young people with coping strategies."

She also said that reading disturbing material does not necessarily lead to unsocial behavior.

"People often overestimate the power of a fiction book," she continued. "People can read fiction stories and not have those stories impact us, just like many of us watch horrific stories on television news and not have a reaction."

Read more hot stories Moms Are Talking About.


next: Michael Vick to Get His Own Show
25 comments so far | Post a comment now
Annie October 8, 2009, 9:18 AM

Ok, so I get that the teacher should not have given this book around. However, perhaps she did so because she felt that the kid would identify with some of the themes and it would be of benefit to him. Regardless, banning books is distasteful to me. I admit to reading “The Clan of the Cave Bear” when I was 11 and had awesome teachers who taught formerly banned books to me throughout my high school years. I always viewd them in the context in which they were written and with guidance, I learned more than if I read them secretly. If this dad wants to keep his son from reading certain books, that’s his decision to make as a parent. He should not, however, make that decision for all parents and children. Banning this book would be wrong.

Anonymous October 8, 2009, 9:29 AM

personally, I think parents over react a lot these days. How can we expect our children to learn or think for themselves if they are always sheltered? If he’s concerned about what his son will or wont do because of reading this book, maybe he should sit down with him and do some actual parenting. Talk to him, carry out a conversation, find out what he thinks with regards to what is written.

Sandra October 8, 2009, 9:36 AM

I read this book when I was a teen and I remember it making me feel so much less alone. I was an avid reader in high school and I read some thing I shouldn’t have, and trust me it this book doesn’t begin to compare to the pornography I’ve read. Guess what, I’m about to reveal a horrible truth to the parents out their, a teen in 11th grade deals with drugs, homosexuality, and (gasp) even masturbation. You can’t keep your child hidden from the real world, but you can help them deal with it. I think I still have my copy of the book packed away somewhere and I’ll give it to my son when he is in high school.

Anonymous October 8, 2009, 11:19 AM

She is my teacher. I love her class, and she’s great at teaching. Last week was banned books week, and I think if someone wants to read something, they should be able to. Freedom of speech. She is a great teacher and NEVER would do anything to purposely hurt or offend anyone.

Sara October 8, 2009, 1:00 PM

Oh, Please. The kid is 16, not six. I’m sure none of that was new.

logan October 29, 2009, 6:51 AM

I think that the charge of corrupting the youth is what every teacher should aspire too

Kimmely October 29, 2009, 10:08 PM

I read The Perks of Being a Wallflower when I was 17 and I can honestly say it didn’t warp my mind or alter my morals in anyway… if anything it reinforced them. Obviously this man missed the entire meaning of the story, but I stand by his decision to not let his son read the material. His kid is still a minor, so therefore his word is law…. I really wish this amazing book wouldn’t be banned from schools though. I wish parents could be more active in their childs education without ruining it for everyone. I mean read the books first, see if your kid can handle it, then move on from there, don’t immediately deem it ‘pornography’ and keep other parents from checking out themselves… This kind of reaction only tarnishes the meaning of this book. Calling it trash gives people a misinturpretation that they keep with them while reading it and any other work like it… that kind of attitude doesn’t make for very objective reading.

Phil November 4, 2009, 12:56 PM

This is absolutely ridiculous. If oprah recommends a controversial book, and your junior in highschool decides to read it, youre not going to get on oprah’s case about it. At that point in your child’s life if you still need to hold his or her hand and make sure they do the right thing, you probably haven’t raised them right

Oliver November 7, 2009, 5:43 PM

Censorship is telling a man he can’t have a steak because a baby can’t chew it.

-Mark Twain

imshandon November 8, 2009, 3:36 AM

Ahhhh, So many believers in one being allowed to chose what to read in school.But how many are hypocrites here….Would you still feel the same if the book in question was the bible?Would you still think this is a crazy parent?or would you be waving around your hands in despair for our children…..pick a side and stand for it!

Allison November 10, 2009, 7:53 PM

I read this book just recently, after my 16 year old read it. My first thought was that it would make a lot of kids feel like they were just a little bit less weird than they think they are. Adolescence is hell…we all remember it. I think the book performs a service. Kids are going to masturbate, the gay kids are going to have gay sex, and many will experiment with drugs…and that’s whether or not they read about it in a book. That guy should be happy his kid is reading at all.

Allison
~~47 year old mother of six

j November 16, 2009, 10:42 PM

FOX News.

‘Nuff said.

Rachel November 19, 2009, 5:50 PM

did anyone else pick up on that this kid is in 11th grade? In tenth grade i was reading explicit descriptions of sex, homosexuality, and drug, supplied to me by my mother. Holding your child’s hand at 17 isn’t going to prepare them for life very well. What’s his dad going to do in two years? “Oh, can’t go to this college, there’s drug use and parties on the weekends.”

Kimmely November 19, 2009, 5:56 PM

To imshandon,
I think not only are you trying to prevoke something, but I think you’ve missed the point. Sepperation of church and state is a law, there is however no law banning books written by Stephen Chbosky. Even still, I have no problem with the Bible being read in classes, I just think it should be an objective reading, just like with Perks of Being a Wallflower. Religious texts are very different from fiction novels, but like with all books, if its going to be taught in school, multiple perspectives should be addressed to cover the entire subject.

Nikto December 8, 2009, 8:51 PM

…Religious texts are very different from fiction novels… WOW. Yes.. They are very different - very bad fiction. I only wish to see the world would outgrow someday this nightmare.


Kimmely December 8, 2009, 11:37 PM

Nikto, way to read TOO far between the lines. Religious books are different because like it or not a large number of people devote everything to their religion. I’m not implying that religion is absolute and that you can’t touch it, just that the atmosphere surrounding religious texts is very different than that of Perks. That being said, don’t immediately assume things, or insult others for their religious view points. I’m a pagan, and I have no problem with other beliefs. It’s not that difficult, trust me…

cheapviagra2461 August 30, 2010, 10:51 AM
payday loan December 10, 2010, 5:30 AM

I loved this post. You describe this topic wonderfully. When hiring home contractors it can be key to pick a trusted name in construction. Experienced and efficient staff should shoot for excellence and absorb every detail of your house.

instant payday loans December 10, 2010, 8:24 AM

Easily that’s not me against that which you saying but i must exclude that you’re not valid about this issue. Why on the planet person convertd a great deal in lifetime of time? Can’t we just coincide on all causes? We had comparable overuse injury in our business.Decoding the situation want some concentrated analysis

no fax payday loans December 13, 2010, 3:24 PM

I had been pretty pleased to discover this web site.I needed to i appreciate you for an excellent read!! I definitely enjoying every little it and I maybe you have bookmarked to think about new items you post.


Leave a reply:



(not displayed)

     




Avoid clicking "Post" more than once
Back to top >>
advertisement