sign up for the momlogic newsletter

Too Fat to Graduate?

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Lincoln University is refusing to give diplomas to two dozen obese students who ditched a health class.

feet on weight scale

Elizabeth Gates for The Daily Beast: Lincoln University, the nation's first historically black college in Oxford, Pennsylvania, has decided that a handful of students won't be getting their diplomas this spring. It wasn't because they were underachieving kids caught in a "senior slump," had pending library charges, or even disciplinary issues. This group of over two dozen African American students will not get to walk across the stage and shake hands in front of their proud parents because they're fat.

In 2006, the university implemented a mandatory semester-long program entitled "Fitness for Life," which aimed to educate the portion of their student population with a body mass index of 30 or higher on physical fitness, nutrition, and the health risks associated with obesity, and how to maintain (or obtain) a healthy physique. While this sounds like a promising initiative that certainly caters to the demographic that needs it most--young black Americans--two dozen of the 92 hopeful graduates who registered as freshman with a BMI of 30 or higher (qualifying them as obese) decided not to enroll in the course. Professors and students are now divided over what role the university should play in students' nutritional education and whether being overweight should deny anyone a diploma.

Simply put, these students should graduate. They should walk the line, toss their mortar boards, and make their mamas proud. But the greater issue that needs to be explored is why these capable students, all of whom met the multitude of other graduation requirements, would opt out of completing a short course that caters to their own health and well-being. Lincoln University is wrong to hold them back from graduating, but the students are also at fault for refusing to educate themselves, especially when faced with statistics that predict a dire future.

According to a recent study conducted at Washington University in St. Louis, 90 percent of black children will be in a household that uses food stamps at least once by the time they turn 20. That number is certainly staggering, but the reality is that beyond Whole Foods, which does accept EBT cards (the food stamp debit card), most African American families burdened by this plight simply do not know their options. In order to get more food for their dollar, they would rather stock up at Costco, the country's "largest warehouse-club chain," which will soon start accepting food stamps. Quantity over quality is a difficult decision for any parent, but when multiple mouths need three meals a day, paying $2.00 for an organic, locally-grown potato is never the most practical option.

The black community has a long and unbalanced history of nutrition-related illness when compared to the white community, ranging from high blood pressure (hypertension accounts for 20 percent of African American deaths, twice that of the white community) to diabetes (12.5 percent of African Americans over 18 years old will be diagnosed with diabetes, versus only 1.8 percent of non-Hispanic whites). Without an early foundation of nutritional education, the idea of trading in a buttermilk biscuit for an egg-white omelet is daunting, to say the least.

The world at large might be trending towards organic and locally-grown foods, but many inner-city families are still forced to maintain their households on government assistance. Organic farmers' markets don't often pop up on breezy Sunday mornings between project buildings clustered in American inner cities, and the food pyramid is no rival to the local bodega's endless rack of penny juices and 25 cent bags of chips. Exposure to a healthy lifestyle at a young age is a vital part of education, and when the rest of the campus is indulging in beer bashes and midnight pizza runs, the last thing on a teenager's mind is reevaluating long held eating habits and slimming down to a reasonable BMI.

Without implementing educational health resources in primary and secondary inner city schools, collegiate-based programs like "Fitness for Life" will always be questioned--or in the case of the two dozen students at Lincoln, downright ignored.

Lincoln University should be applauded for their efforts to educate their students on nutrition, and considering a higher institution's responsibility to the student body makes it plausible to understand both sides of this argument. The stark reality, however, is that "Fitness for Life" should be mandatory for all students at Lincoln University, not only the ones who literally tip the scales. Lincoln University is an HBCU (historically black college) where much of the student population is uninformed about health and nutrition. To mandate the program strictly for overweight students is both short-sighted and insulting. In other words, thick-headed.

Read more stories moms are talking about.




previous: Dad Too Drunk to Remember Where He Parked His Son
next: Polanski Makes $4.5 Million Bail

12 comments so far | Post a comment now >>

 
Could it be that their course schedules didn’t allow them to take the class? I always had a tightly-packed schedule of requirements back when I was in college, and as such, I would have had to have paid extra to take an additional course. Also, I suffer from a metabolic disorder that makes me put on weight easier than most people. Is the university taking these sorts of things into account when they’re requiring students to take this course?
- MarMar
Posted 11/25/09 01:20 PM
 
You can feed your family healthy and cheap at Costco. Organic does not automatically mean healthy by nutritional standards. Though I would feel rather mad in their place. If this wasn’t instated before they signed up, it should not hold them back. And this class, better, BETTER be paid for by the school and not the students. Which naturally, a momlogic article doesn’t even state its source, so I can’t see if it is or not. What a surprise.
- Nope
Posted 11/25/09 02:53 PM
 
If the students were notified of this course - which I’m sure they were - then they should *not* get their diplomas. The students are not going to be denied their diplomas “because they’re fat.” They’re not getting their diplomas because they didn’t take a class required for graduation. The course is mandatory. If they had failed to achieve other mandatory requirements, this article wouldn’t have been written.
- Skip
Posted 11/25/09 02:53 PM
 
If the course is mandatory, it should be mandatory for EVERY student not just overweight ones. Just because a student isn’t overweight doesn’t mean they have healthy habits, skinny people could learn just as much from this course, otherwise the college should mind their own business.
- Robin
Posted 11/25/09 03:02 PM
 
They DID NOT NOT graduate because they were FAT. They didn’t graduate because they did not take a REQIRED COURSE that they had FOUR YEARS to take. Period. 68 out of the 92 took the required class. I’m sure once they take the class they will get their diplomas.
- Chrissy
Posted 11/25/09 11:41 PM
 
I was overweight in college. I would have been mortified if I was forced to take this class. It is singling them out and Im sure quite embarassing. Yes, health is important, but I feel this is crossing the line.
- Jessica
Posted 11/27/09 02:53 AM
 
Sounds to me that the phys ed class at Lincoln is not attended by enough students so the school is forcing some students to take the course which has nothing what so ever with their education, but everything to do with making more money for the school with course and and book fees. This is discrimination at it’s worst! What are they going to do next discriminate against students who are missing fingers, or maybe they have one blue eye and one brown eye? How stupid can the University get. They would never get my or my kid’s money. What a bunch of jerks. Good by Lincoln University!!!
- Bill
Posted 11/27/09 06:35 AM
 
look at it this way, if your health is at risk, and your are African American, no big company will take a risk on you. improve your health and you will improve your life
- andre
Posted 11/27/09 09:23 AM
 
What’s going on here? Back in the 60s, every college curricula included such mandatory “non-major/minor” courses as English, history, so-on-so-forth, and physical education. The purpose of these courses, generally a solidified version of those courses from high school days, was to ensure a well-balanced education, both from a professional standpoint and “bio-social” footing enabling a generation to assume broader perspectives within a complex world. Many of the problems evident in today’s contemporary society were “hatched” as a result of a “watered-down” public education system. By the time college-bound kids saw the halls of academe, and well-past graduation day, their basic preparation for the world was woefully inadequate. Inasmuch as generations of the 60s, and before, grew up on ballfields and battlefields, we are seeing fewer and fewer of the more-recent generations who did not grow up in a bubble of ignorance and an over-protective environment. True that while the university in question may be treading shakey grounds, both from a legal and a moral standpoint, their leadership is to be commended for recognizing a problem which, conceivably, could have negative repercussions on our society, our Country, and for the values long-held as a basis for our very way of life.
- Sarge
Posted 11/27/09 07:43 PM
 
Well, I have some problems with this… who’s next? People with poor dental health?? How about those who are away from home TOO MUCH because they are working two jobs to pay for their education? Silly I know, but why is it that “big brother” always seems to know what’s better for us… another opportunity to impose more regulation upon us- whether we like it or not. After all, THEY know what’s best for us don’t they???!!! One more thing, simple math really…. If they started this in 2006, wouldn’t students who are set to graduate in 2009 have started their schooling in 2005 (4 years for a Bachelor’s)?? Thus, students could either simply thumb their nose at this rule and ignore it, or file a lawsuit- I would encourage the latter; it seems to be the only way too get the schools attention… Certainly the “academics” could find a better way!!!!!!!!?????!!!!
- JonTX
Posted 11/27/09 09:29 PM
 
This blows my mind. I have an idea. How about they start drug testing students and those that fail the drug test can’t graduate. Or those that are voted ugly have to take a beauty class. If you go in for BMI testing and it’s obvious that you’re underweight (anorexic etc) do they force you to go take a fattening up class? This goes down in the category of stupid stunts to get your school some publicity.
- WOW
Posted 11/30/09 04:33 PM
 
What about the fact that some of these people could be actively wanting to be overweight? Is it a Univeristies right to impose their view of what is normal on a person? This is ridilicious as they do not know what the individuals feel about his or her own weight. They could view it as a positive thing and do not want to be enrolled in a class that tells them they are wrong for being this way. No educational body should force someone to enroll in a program just because they feel they are overweight and therefore need to be taught the right way of living according to them. People have choices in their life, and some of those people could be seeking to be overweight.
- Deg
Posted 12/03/09 01:21 AM
(not displayed)
  remember me?      
 

Avoid clicking “Post” more than once.

resources
experts guides
bloggers staff
newsletter videos
games twitter
advertisement

Win a $5000 Hershey's Diamond Pendant!
Enter Here

Win a $5000 Hershey's Diamond Pendant!

enter here

community

Join the Momlogic community!

 

momlogic community logo

 

Sign Up
Login
Enter without joining

coupons       More special offers     momsview coupons  

Amby Baby Motion Beds/Hammocks Recalled

find out more