twitter facebook stumble upon rss

Obama to Seek Big Changes to 'No Child Left Behind'

sign up for the momlogic newsletter Tweet This

Associated Press: WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama is proposing to overhaul the No Child Left Behind education law, replacing the school accountability system that has slapped a failing label on more than a third of schools, including many that made big gains but just missed their annual targets.

obama no child left behind

No Child Left Behind prods schools to improve test scores each year, so that every student can read and do math on grade level by the year 2014.

In his budget plan, Obama proposed judging schools differently, looking at student growth and schools' progress from one year to the next. Schools that do well would get incentives and rewards; schools that do poorly would face intervention and other consequences.

Education Secretary Arne Duncan credited No Child Left Behind with shining a spotlight on children who need the most help. But he told reporters Monday on a conference call the law "does too little to reward progress."

The president's budget plan says Obama would recognize and reward schools for helping kids make gains, even if they aren't yet on grade level.

Administration officials have spent recent weeks discussing their goals in meetings with education groups. Kati Haycock, president of the Education Trust, said "this administration is not going to retreat" from pushing poor-performing schools to do better.

"The reality is, less might be expected of some, but more will be expected of others," said Haycock, who participated in the meetings.

There are no details yet; officials have spoken only broadly about their plan.

Championed by President George W. Bush and signed into law in 2002, No Child Left Behind is overdue for a rewrite and Obama hopes Congress will pass a new law this year.

Critics argue the law's annual reading and math tests have forced other subjects like music and art from the classroom and that schools were promised billions of dollars that never showed up.

The new budget blueprint, and the recent meetings with education groups, give a look at Obama's thinking on other aspects of the law:

• Teachers. The 2002 law said all teachers in core academic subjects must be "highly qualified" but let states define what that meant; as a result, most teachers in the U.S. are now deemed highly qualified. Instead, Obama wants to measure teachers by how much their students improve, and he wants to do a better job of making sure disadvantaged kids, who are more likely to get inexperienced teachers, get experienced ones. The budget would create a $950 million competitive grant program for teacher recruitment and retention.

• Spending. Obama wants to make federal education spending more competitive to drive states and schools to do better, rather than relying on formulas that give states and districts a certain amount of money regardless of how well they educate kids. The president began with the $4.35 billion "Race to the Top" competitive grant program created by the economic stimulus. His budget would make more K-12 spending competitive -- but money from the larger programs, those for poor children and children with disabilities, still would be distributed through traditional formulas. And his budget would add another $1.35 billion to the Race to the Top program.

• Standards. The president is pushing states to adopt tougher academic standards; his budget would give states money to align math and science teaching with higher standards. Nearly all the states have signed onto an effort by the National Governors Association and Council of Chief State School Officers to develop a set of high-quality standards. The Race to the Top program also will reward states for working toward those standards.

Read more stories moms are talking about.



next: Americans in Haiti Could Be Charged with Child Trafficking
3 comments so far | Post a comment now
tennmom February 1, 2010, 5:47 PM

In theory, great idea. In practice, it just hasn’t worked.
My younger daughter is in her last year of public school. She will join my older daughter at a private university prep school this fall.
Although our public school is over 65% minority students, our state doesn’t consider that percentage high enough to receive extra funding. Sure, many of the students receive reduced or free breakfast and/or lunch. One of my gripes is the fact that half of the 20 computers in their computer lab don’t work most of the time. We are lucky enough to have computers at home so it hasn’t been a big deal as far as my girls are concerned, but what about the child of a parent/parents without a computer at home, without the ability to run to the library to use a computer when needed? Those children are left falling behind some of their peers through no fault of their own.
As it stands, our state bases funding on each school’s average scores on our state’s standardized test. Our school has MANY Spanish speaking children who spend hours a week in an English as a second language class, yet they have to take the standardized test in English. It is not fair to ask a child having trouble telling his/her teacher which lunch choice they want to take a 4 day test in a language some barely understand.
The gifted kids are also getting the short end of the stick. A teacher once told me that they can only teach as fast as the “slowest” learner can keep up. Some just need more time and I understand that. However, the gifted program in our county’s public school only provides(ed) 2 hours a week for my girls. The program doesn’t help the faster learners get ahead, but instead gives the kids extra side projects to keep them busy during down time.
All children deserve the education they need. Kids who have trouble in certain subjects deserve extra time and help. The children who are a step or 4 above average should have the resources to move ahead.

--Thank the LORD! February 2, 2010, 10:32 AM

As a spe ed teacher— this is an answered prayer— I am all for being positive when it concerns the progress that can be made by students who receive spe ed services— however, by wording things that each child should be “performing on grade level” by 2014 is ridiculous— it should say each child will be performing at their highest ability level— b/c let’s be real, when you have a 12th grader with a 58IQ, there will be no algebra that can be accomplished— it’s not possible…and MacBeth will not be on the reading list either, someone w/ a 58IQ should be taught living skills…..just my 2 cents…

Ten Tees January 8, 2011, 2:43 PM

Interesting post. Nice and fun reading. I’ve just got one point to offer about funny shirts.


Leave a reply:



(not displayed)

     




Avoid clicking "Post" more than once
Back to top >>
advertisement