twitter facebook stumble upon rss

Obama to Push 'No Child Left Behind' Overhaul

sign up for the momlogic newsletter Tweet This

CNN: The Obama administration plans to send a wide-ranging overhaul of the No Child Left Behind education law to Congress on Monday, arguing that the current legislation has pushed schools to lower their standards to meet federal requirements.

president obama

The 8-year-old law was one of the signature policies of the Bush administration. It set up a regimen of state reading and math tests for students in third through eighth grades, intended to identify failing schools. But critics have said the Bush administration never properly funded the effort and that states needed more flexibility in meeting those goals.

During his weekly radio address Saturday, President Obama said his administration's proposed overhaul will "set a high bar -- but we also provide educators the flexibility to reach it."

"Under these guidelines, schools that achieve excellence or show real progress will be rewarded, and local districts will be encouraged to commit to change in schools that are clearly letting their students down," he said.

Are your schools having trouble?

During his 2008 presidential campaign, Obama said the law's goal was "the right one," but the legislation "has significant flaws that need to be addressed." And Education Secretary Arne Duncan told CNN last week that educators have "lowered the bar" to meet No Child Left Behind standards.
Video: Obama's new lesson plan

* Education
* Barack Obama
* Arne Duncan
* National Education Association

"We've had low expectations -- not because it's the right thing educationally, not because it's the right thing for our economy. We did it because of political pressure," Duncan said.

The Department of Education has identified 11 states it said lowered math standards. But several of those states have disputed that conclusion, and it was not clear whether any reduced their standards so that their scores would look better.

The administration's "Blueprint for Reform" shifts the focus from singling out underperforming schools to fostering a "race to the top" to reward successful reforms. The proposed revisions promise that low-performing schools that fail to improve will be asked to show "dramatic change," but states and school districts be held accountable for those shortcomings as well.

It supports the expansion of public charter schools and calls for giving states and school districts additional flexibility in how they spend federal dollars, "as long as they are continuing to focus on what matters most -- improving outcomes for students." And it also allows them to use federal grant funds to change the way teachers and principals are paid, "to provide differentiated compensation and career advancement opportunities to educators who are effective in increasing student academic achievement," among other considerations.

But the newly published "blueprint" immediately came under fire from the nation's largest teachers union, the National Education Association, which said it was "disappointed" by Obama's proposals.

"We were expecting more funding stability to enable states to meet higher expectations," the union's president, Dennis Van Roekel, said in a statement issued over the weekend. "Instead, the 'blueprint' requires states to compete for critical resources, setting up another winners-and-losers scenario. We were expecting school turnaround efforts to be research-based and fully collaborative. Instead, we see too much top-down scapegoating of teachers and not enough collaboration."

The Obama administration's $50 billion proposed education budget adds $3 billion in funding to help schools meet these revised goals, with the possibility of an additional $1 billion if the overhaul plan passes Congress.

Read more stories moms are talking about.

next: Baby-Wearing ... for Dogs?!
4 comments so far | Post a comment now
Caitie March 15, 2010, 1:07 PM

It should be noted, though this article didn’t mention it, that education, cognitive and developmental psychology research has shown over and over that No Child Left Behind does not work, yet for the past 8 years policy makers have ignored the research. About time some change is on the way.

egene March 15, 2010, 7:22 PM

Does this mean an end will come to busing? Has anyone weighed the positive vs the negative of busing? Simple, if you take an underprivileged child and put them in the school with privileged students, yes maybe the under child will rise, but at the same time the priv child will gain nothing. Stop satisfying the needs of groups, and start educating our children to the level of their individual abilities regardless of where they live or race or ethnicity. It has not worked for 20 years and it will never work for the best interests of all students.

Anonymous March 16, 2010, 4:49 AM

What this article also doesn’t mention is the fact that even though this policy went into effect during Bush’s term, it was in fact a Ted Kennedy bill supported by democrats.

Priscila Gofman July 25, 2010, 10:18 PM

@Sara- I feel the same way

Back to top >>