twitter facebook stumble upon rss

Larry King's Mistress to Sue for 'Breach of Promise'?

sign up for the momlogic newsletter Tweet This

There are reports surfacing today that Larry King's alleged mistress -- his wife Shawn's sister, Shannon Engemann -- is threatening to sue Larry for "breach of promise." She alleges that he PROMISED to leave his wife (her sister!) for her, and she can sue over that. Say what? We asked attorney Robin Sax to explain.

larry King

Robin Sax: The blessing and curse with the American legal system is that anyone can file a lawsuit for anything. But just because you can file a lawsuit does not mean that you can actually win a lawsuit.

There are two legal issues here. First, a lawsuit for breach of contract by a lover is most likely going to be violative public policy. The law favors married couples working things out and upholding marriage. It is likely that a promise to get divorced would be considered against public policy, and therefore this contract would not be valid. As a matter of fact, in seven states, the wife, Shawn, could (if she was in one of those states) sue Shannon for interference with affection.

Second, this is a promise that Larry King may not have been legally able to make -- therefore, it's a legally unenforceable contract. Larry King could not legally promise marriage when he was married at the time of the alleged promise. A court will likely be unable to find that there was a legal contract; therefore, there would be no breach. He was unable to enter a contract and perform on the "contract" he allegedly made, because he was MARRIED AT THE TIME ... a fact Shannon obviously knew.

This is different from a case wherein someone sent invitations for a wedding, bought a dress and made plans based on the belief that they had entered into an agreement to get married. Here, what's Shannon going to say is the damage or the loss -- all of the gifts and money she potentially would have received? And the case is further compromised by the fact that she originally denied the relationship in the beginning.

This sounds like a scorned woman who is throwing spaghetti in the air to see if anything will stick. Legally speaking, I say she will lose in a "breach of promise" case.

Do YOU think Shannon should sue? Comment below.


next: Sleepover-less in Seattle
7 comments so far | Post a comment now
Anonymous May 13, 2010, 1:49 PM

I think Shannon is a piece of trash! Having an affair with your own sister husband is disgusting.

Black Iris May 13, 2010, 4:28 PM

I think she is doing it so she can make money on talk shows or writing a book. Ugh. Could we all just boycott her?

joseph cantone May 14, 2010, 3:39 AM

anyone who would have an affair with his sister is a slob. if your talking boycott everyone should boycott his show.

Micaela  May 14, 2010, 11:44 AM

When I hear stories like these, I am so thankful I have no sisters!

JEJ May 15, 2010, 11:33 PM

Larry King is old and nasty. Can you imagine being in bed with that wrinkly thing?

download full movies September 11, 2010, 8:04 PM

Good day, Good site, wherever did you come up in the details in this summation? Im glad I found it though, I’ll be checking back soon to see what other articles or blog posts you have.

tychy imprezy December 17, 2010, 4:28 AM

Hi there. I would like to thank you for the superinformation you wrote on your website. I will be back to review again.


Back to top >>
advertisement