twitter facebook stumble upon rss

School Bans Mom from Volunteering

sign up for the momlogic newsletter Tweet This

WPRI: The Rhode Island ACLU is suing Cranston's school department for discrimination -- for not allowing a mother to volunteer in her daughter's school, because she failed a criminal background check.

ACLU250.jpg

Jessica Gianfrocco was convicted of heroin possession six years ago, and did time at the ACI for 90 days. However, she now says she's trying to do right by her daughter, and volunteer at her elementary school.

"I've been volunteering since she was 18-months-old, at her day care and some of the sports she does. She loves it. She loves introducing me to her friends, and I get to see her interact with people," said Gianfrocco Monday.

The RI ACLU says Cranston's screening policy is tougher on parent volunteers who might be there once a week than it is on its own employees who are there every day.

"Teachers are not automatically disqualified, based on a prior drug record, from employment. Vendors are not automatically disqualified from being at the school just because of a prior drug conviction," said the ACLU's Carly Beauvais.

The organization agrees some convictions can legally disqualify volunteers from working in a school: "Child molestation, or patient abuse, where there is a connection with harm to another individual," said Beauvais.

In this case, where someone who served her time and has been clean of drugs for six years, the ACLU says Gianfrocco is being given no chance of recourse, no appeal.

"They told me there was no appeal process," she said, even though district's policy over the matter specifically outlines such an appeals process.

As of 5 p.m. Monday, the Cranston School Department had not responded to Eyewitness News's requests for comment related to the lawsuit.

The ACLU said other school districts have similar screening policies that are potentially unfair and discriminatory, but Gianfrocco is the first willing to step forward to demand change.

Read more stories in the news.


next: Parents Slam Decision to Cut Recess
6 comments so far | Post a comment now
Judy August 26, 2010, 6:28 AM

Next week’s article: Rhode Island Teachers Complain About Lack Of Parent Volunteers.”

Carolyn (temysmom) August 26, 2010, 7:13 AM

This is awful. I’m not opposed to a background check but there has got to be some leeway for a mother who’s been off drugs for years. Give her a break! By the way, my kids’ school doesn’t do background checks or drug tests on parents.

christy August 26, 2010, 7:36 AM

Omg wtf? People do change! I have been off meth since the day I found out I was pregnant with serenity! People make mistakes! Just because she has in the past made some mistakes doesn’t mean she’s a bad person…she has gotten her life together I don’t see why she shouldn’t be allowed to volunteer especially since she’s been clean for 6 years!I would be so mad if my daughters school told me I couldn’t voluteer because I had problems in the past with drugs!

christy August 26, 2010, 8:00 AM

Omg wtf? People do change! I have been off meth since the day I found out I was pregnant with serenity! People make mistakes! Just because she has in the past made some mistakes doesn’t mean she’s a bad person…she has gotten her life together I don’t see why she shouldn’t be allowed to volunteer especially since she’s been clean for 6 years!I would be so mad if my daughters school told me I couldn’t voluteer because I had problems in the past with drugs!

Wendy August 26, 2010, 12:38 PM

I can understand what they’re trying to do. They’re trying to ensure that someone doesn’t come on campus and have intimate interaction with these kids who might be a bad influence. A vendor has no real contact with the kids, and a teacher…well, I’m not sure how they can explain that one.

But I do think that there needs to be some leeway. She was convicted for heroin. Ok, no, not a good thing. But she’s been clean since then, and she apparently hasn’t been in trouble for anything else, I’m not sure why it should be held against her. Or why her daughter should be punished for what she did, which is kind of what’s happening here, because her daughter loves that she volunteers for stuff she’s in.

Wendy August 26, 2010, 12:38 PM

I can understand what they’re trying to do. They’re trying to ensure that someone doesn’t come on campus and have intimate interaction with these kids who might be a bad influence. A vendor has no real contact with the kids, and a teacher…well, I’m not sure how they can explain that one.

But I do think that there needs to be some leeway. She was convicted for heroin. Ok, no, not a good thing. But she’s been clean since then, and she apparently hasn’t been in trouble for anything else, I’m not sure why it should be held against her. Or why her daughter should be punished for what she did, which is kind of what’s happening here, because her daughter loves that she volunteers for stuff she’s in.


Leave a reply:



(not displayed)

     




Avoid clicking "Post" more than once
Back to top >>
advertisement