twitter facebook stumble upon rss

We've Come a Long Way, Baby! Except for Our Salaries

sign up for the momlogic newsletter Tweet This
As American culture steers a bumpy course toward a matriarchal society, two speed bumps have marred the smooth pavement: the recession and ageism. Next year, college campuses will graduate three women for every two men, and women now make up the majority of the workforce. But for the first time in three decades, the pay gap between men and women has frozen -- and women over the age of 35 still make substantially less than men.
The recession has been a double-edged sword for women's career progress. On the one hand, it pushed women to a statistical majority. In November of 2009, women officially outnumbered men in the workforce as the flailing economy forced companies to lay off expensive male employees. But those same forces may have also caused pay increases to stall -- and maybe even worsen -- for women workers. 

This disturbing picture comes from the latest population statistics from the U.S. government. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, "After a gradual rise in the 1980s and 1990s, the women's-to-men's earnings ratio peaked at 81 percent in 2005 and 2006." Back in 1979, women made 62 percent as much as men, and that gap continued to narrow until 2006, when it stalled at around 80 percent. 

Worse news is that when salaries are broken down by age, experienced older women fare worse than newbie young ladies. Last year, women aged 16 to 24 earned 93 percent of what their male colleagues did, and those aged 25 to 34 made 89 percent. But once women reached the ripe old age of 35, they made only 75 percent as much as men. 

There could be three forces at work here. One culprit might be classic ageism, which seems to be leveled at women more often than men. (A preference for youth and beauty is a coveted anthropological reality with homo sapiens.) Another theory involves capitalist pressures: It's more economically feasible for companies to provide pay parity at the entry level, where salaries are lower (the stakes get higher at the executive level). Finally, the pregnancy rate of women over 30 has continued to rise, and older women -- who have accumulated some assets and have a financial edge over young women -- may take longer maternity leaves or choose part-time work, thereby affecting the income statistic. 

No matter the reasons behind the current stalled pay gap, in not too many years, employers (who will likely be a female majority themselves) will have no choice but to hire and treat women equally. According to an Atlantic Magazine article entitled "The End of Men," 75 percent of embryos created in fertility clinics are female -- per parental request. 

Very soon, "Girl's Rule!" will be more than just a T-shirt slogan.

next: Ten Tips for a Stress-Free Summer Vacation with Toddlers
3 comments so far | Post a comment now
Chris August 4, 2010, 4:13 PM

Like you said, I think employers will have to treat women equally, eventually. In fact I wouldn’t be surprised if women’s salaries actually rise above men’s. More of the younger women are better educated and more qualified. As more older male CEO’s and leaders retire, more women will fill their spots.
As a man with only a high school degree, with a job in sanitization, I’m seeing more women now that are breadwinners, including my wife and my sister, who both have degrees and who both make more than my brother in law and I. I’m seeing this is true for most of my male freinds as well. I think you are correct in saying ‘Girls Rule’ and I think we are headed towards a more matriarchal society, which I’m sure will be much better than what we have now.

Jebalke August 7, 2010, 9:30 PM

Unfortunately, there is a logical and rational explanation as to why women make less than men.

From the employer’s perspective, at “any given time” a women could get pregnant. It sucks that this is the reason, but because when women procreate, we are (usually) less productive in the final months of pregnancy than we are normally. Additionally, if there are complications with the pregnancy of birth, a woman might be out of her job for up to 6 months. That’s a lot of time, so much, that the company might have to hire a temporary replacement for that woman.

Therefore, a man in a position rather than a woman is less of a potential liability, and paid more.

cheapviagra7937 August 30, 2010, 9:10 AM

cheap drug generic ultram ultram viagra 5 cheapest viagra substitute sildenafil viagra cheap generic

Back to top >>