twitter facebook stumble upon rss

Sarah Palin Opposed to First Lady's Anti-Obesity Campaign

sign up for the momlogic newsletter Tweet This
Guest blogger Kate Tuttle: Michelle Obama, following in established First Lady footsteps, has adopted a couple of issues to focus on as an advocate during her husband's time in office. For both Laura and Barbara Bush, the issues were education and literacy; for Hillary Clinton, it was women and children's health. In other words, being married to the President and working on the behalf of relatively uncontroversial feel-good issues just kind of go together. So there's nothing really shocking about Michelle Obama planting a vegetable garden at the White House, going on "Sesame Street" to talk about healthy eating with Elmo or promoting her "Let's Move!" campaign against childhood obesity. Except to Sarah Palin.

Sarah Palin
On Laura Ingraham's radio show last week, the former Republican Vice Presidential candidate slammed Michelle Obama's anti-obesity program, warning that it smacks of government intrusion into parental decisions over how to feed and raise children.

A quote: "Take her anti-obesity thing that she is on. She is on this kick, right. What she is telling us is she cannot trust parents to make decisions for their own children, for their own families in what we should eat. And I know I'm going to be again criticized for bringing this up, but instead of a government thinking that they need to take over and make decisions for us according to some politician or politician's wife priorities, just leave us alone, get off our back and allow us as individuals to exercise our own God-given rights to make our own decisions and then our country gets back on the right track."

Now, I've read the stuff on the Let's Move website (which has sections on food and nutrition, exercise and other health-related topics). I'm not seeing any kind of massive government takeover of the food industry, and certainly not of individual families' kitchens. What I do see is middle-of-the-road, common-sense advice and information for parents, as well as some policy recommendations for better product package information (so that, for instance, junk food cannot hide its true caloric and sodium loads by misleading consumers about the size of a "portion") and a call for partnerships with pediatricians so that children's doctors get more involved in supporting families to raise healthier kids. Nobody's advocating taking away parental authority over kids, although I have to admit, there are times when I wish I could intervene whenever I see a family of supersized kids whose parents clearly are contributing to their lifelong poor health.

Another kid-focused political food fight is in the works, this one on Capitol Hill, where Congress is prepared to vote this week on a bill authorizing an expansion of eligibility for free and reduced school lunches -- particularly needed in today's economy, where an estimated 20 percent of children (35 percent of black children) are living at or below the poverty line. (Those figures are from 2008, so they are certainly understated.) The bill also sets new guidelines in place to ensure that school lunches are nutritionally sound. Given that many children receive inadequate meals at home, making sure that what they get at school is good for them seems to be eminently sound public policy. Even the relatively conservative FOXNews organization argues that school lunch programs are essential to helping break the cycle of poverty.

Palin's just using this issue to make political hay -- and I think this one might backfire on her. If there's one thing everybody agrees on, it's that our kids deserve the best lives we can prepare them for. As divided as our country is right now, it's hard to picture anybody but the most extreme Palin fan really buying her argument. As this piece in the Huffington Post makes clear, it may be poor politics for Palin to attack Michelle Obama, who remains more popular than her husband (a common situation for First Ladies), and especially for a program that aims to help children's health, an issue with which it is difficult to ... well, take issue. But Palin works in mysterious ways.

I'm eager to see where she takes this -- and whether or not anyone will follow.

next: Putting Baby on Auto-Soothe
111 comments so far | Post a comment now
best payday loans December 25, 2010, 2:07 PM

Intriguing article. I realize I’m just a little late in posting my comment even so the article were to the and merely the information I’d been looking for. I can’t say that I believe all you could mentioned but it was emphatically fascinating! BTW…I found your site via a Google search. I’m a frequent visitor to your blog and may return again soon.

cash advances payday loans December 25, 2010, 2:53 PM

I was questioning occasion you ever considered altering design in the website? Its really correctly created; I enjoy what youve obtained to state. But possibly you possibly can small a lot more in the way of content so males could get connected to it greater. Youve obtained a horrible total lot of text for only buying a single or two images. Maybe you’ll have the ability to area it greater?

fast cash advance December 25, 2010, 7:04 PM

Wow, that’s an extremely nice read!

fast cash advance December 25, 2010, 7:32 PM

I really loved this post. You describe this topic perfectly. When hiring home contractors it truly is factor to select a trusted name in construction. Experienced and efficient staff should shoot for excellence and seriously consider every detail of your home.

faxless payday loans December 25, 2010, 7:43 PM

I’ve recently started a blog, the knowledge you provide on this web site has reduced the problem tremendously. Appreciate all of your time & work…

BILL COLLIER,, USMC,,,,, January 18, 2011, 9:52 PM


Cheap Conveyancing  February 15, 2011, 12:44 PM

Hello my friend! I want to say that this article is awesome, nice written and include approximately all important infos. I’d like to see more posts like this .

comet laptops March 2, 2011, 6:41 AM

Thankyou for all your efforts that you have put in this. very interesting info .

comet laptops March 5, 2011, 2:01 PM

It’s truly during the year or so of rain that most women attempt to avoid wearing their most precious and favorite dresses so they will not be ruined by way of the harsh effects of that rain. But this strategy will not likely work most especially if there are many glamorous events that they have to attend to and will require them to wear a product nice.

comet laptops March 6, 2011, 5:21 PM

I don’t usually comment but I gotta tell regards for the post on this perfect one : D.

Anonymous April 4, 2011, 8:22 AM

It’s difficult to understand how anyone can be against any type of campaign to reduce/ reverse obesity. In the US (and much of the West) those of unhealthy weight outnumber those of healthy weight. The numbers are staggering and only getting worse. Excess visceral fat has a plethora of negative health effects. Our girths are larger than ever and growing ever more so. Losing belly fat is terribly important. The money we spend now on combating and reversing this trend, the more money we save later by avoiding crippling numbers of obesity related health issues.


Lose belly fat now!

Back to top >>